O papel da conversação, da investigação e da deliberação na resolução de problemas
pragmatistas em diálogo
Palavras-chave:
Conversação, Deliberação, Investigação, Pragmatism, Resolução de problemasResumo
Problemas são geralmente definidos como barreiras para objetivos. Consequentemente, é uma forma de raciocínio prático, entendida como descobrir os meios pelos quais tais barreiras devem ser removidas. A forma geral de raciocínio prático sugere três processos que estariam envolvidos na resolução de problemas. O primeiro é chegar a uma compreensão do problema, que envolve o processo de conversação. O segundo é uma questão de investigação – descobrir as hipóteses práticas, os meios de resolver o problema. Como a resolução de problemas requer cooperação de outros, também requer deliberação entre aqueles afetados por um problema sobre qual das hipóteses práticas funcionará melhor, terminando em algum acordo. Usando o trabalho de pragmatistas, como Peirce, James, Dewey, Addams, Wallace, Kitcher, entre outros, o objetivo do artigo é mostrar uma estrutura normativa para cada um desses processos que pode levar melhor à resolução eficaz de problemas.Referências
ACEMOGLU, D.; ROBINSON, J. Why nations fail. New York: Currency Books, 2012.
ADDAMS, J. A modern Lear. Archives of Women’s Political Communication. Iowa State University, 1895.
ADDAMS, J. The devil baby at Hull House. The Atlantic, October, 1916.
ADDAMS, J. Democracy and social ethics. Creative Space, 2014.
AGRE, G. The concept of problem. Educational Studies, v. 13, p. 121-42, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326993es1302_1
ANTANAVIČIŪTĖ, M. Jane Addams’s feminist pragmatism and international political thought. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-16, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.3234
APEL, K. O. Towards a transformation of philosophy. ADEY. G.; FRISBY, D. (Trans.). New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.
APPIAH, K. Assertion and conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
AUDI, R. Practical reasoning and ethical decision. New York: Routledge, 2006.
BAIN, A. Logic; Deductive and inductive. London: Appleton, 1889.
BHASKAR, R.; SIMON, H. Problem solving in semantically rich domains: an example from thermodynamics. Cognitive Science, v. 1, p. 193-215, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(77)80009-8
BRANDOM, R. Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
CHADWICK, G. Systems View of Planning. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1971.
COHEN, J. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: HAMLIN, A.; PETTIT, P. (Org.). The good polity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
COHEN, J. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: BOHMAN, J.; REHG, W. (Org.). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
COPP, D. Normativity and reasons: Five arguments from Parfit against normative naturalism. In: NUCCETELLI, S.; SEAY, G. (Org.). Ethical naturalism: Current debates. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 24-57.
DAVIS, G. Psychology of problem solving: theory and practice. New York: Basic, 1973.
DEATON, A. The great escape: Health, wealth and the origins of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
DEWEY, J. Human nature and conduct. In: BOYDSTON, J. A. (Org.). The middle works of John Dewey. (v. 14). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008a.
DEWEY, J. The public and its problems. In: BOYDSTON, J. A. (Org.). The later works of John Dewey. (v. 2). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 2008b. p. 235-372.
DEWEY, J. Liberalism and social action. In: BOYDSTON, J. A. (Org.). The later works of John Dewey (v. 13). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008c. p. 1-66.
DEWEY, J. Creative democracy – the task before us. In: BOYDSTON, J. A. (Org.). The later works of John Dewey (v. 14). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008d, p. 224-234.
DIOMIDOUS, M. et al. Social and psychological effects of the internet use. Acta Informatica Medica, v. 24, n.1, p. 66-68, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.66-69
D’ZURILLA, T., et al. Social problem solving: Theory and assessment. In: CHANG, E., et al. (Org.). Social problem solving. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2004.
FRENSCH, P.; FUNKE, J. Complex problem solving: The European Perspective. Hillsdale: Larence Erlbaum, 1995.
GALLUP. Guns, 2023. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx
GIBBARD, A. Reconciling our aims. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
HABERMAS, J. Communication and the evolution of society. Trans. McCarthy, T. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.
HABERMAS, J. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Trans. McCarthy, T. v. 1. Boston: Beacon Press, 1981.
HABERMAS, J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Trans. Lenhardt, C.; Nicholsen, S. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.
HAYES, J. The complete problem solver. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute, 1979.
HENSLEY, F.H. Power and the pursuit of peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
HOOKWAY, C. Truth, rationality and pragmatism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
JAMES, W. The moral philosopher and the moral life. In: MYERS, G. (Org.). Writings 1878-1899 (v.1). Library of America, 1992. p. 595-617.
JAMES, W. Pragmatism. Longmans, Green and Co, 1907.
KANT, I. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Trans. BECK, L. W. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Press, 1959.
KITCHER, P. The ethical project. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.
KITCHER, P. Pragmatism and progress. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, v. 51, n. 4, p. 475-494, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.51.4.06
KITCHER, P. Moral progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
KOOPMAN, C. Pragmatism as transition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.
LISZKA, J. Pragmatist ethics: A problem-based approach to what matters. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2021.
LISZKA, J. Pragmatism and the ethics of meliorism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, v. 13, n. 2, 2021a. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.2442
LISZKA, J. Charles Peirce on ethics, esthetics and the normative sciences. New York: Routledge, 2021b.
MACMILLAN, G. Keeping the conversation going: Jane Addams’ rhetorical strategies in “A Modern Lear”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, v. 32, n. 3, p. 61-75, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940209391234
MACINTYRE, A. After virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1981.
MASSEY, D.; DENTON, N. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
MAYER, R. Thinking and problem Solving: An Introduction to human cognition and learning. New York: Scott, Foresman, 1977.
MCCAMMON, H. et al. A radical demand effect: Early US feminists and the Married Women’s Property Acts. Social Science History, v. 38, n. 1-2, p. 221-250, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2015.17
MISAK, C. Truth, politics, morality: Pragmatism and deliberation. New York: Routledge, 2000.
NEWELL, A.; SIMON, H. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
NICKLES, T. What is a problem that we may solve it? Synthese, v. 47, n.1, p. 85-118, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064267
PEIRCE, C. The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce. In: HARTSHORNE, C., et al. (Orgs.). (8 vols.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. [Cited as original date, CP, volume, paragraph].
PETTIT, P. The birth of ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
PINKER, S. Enlightenment now: the case for reason, science, humanism and progress. New York: Viking Press, 2018.
RADCLIFFE, D. The right to vote and the rise of democracy, 1787-1828. Journal of the Early Republic, v. 33, n. 2, p. 219-254, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1353/jer.2013.0033
RICHARDSON, H. Practical reasoning about final ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
SHOOK, J. Dewey’s ethical justification for public deliberation democracy. Education and Culture, v. 29, n. 1, p. 3-26, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2013.0006
TALISSE, R. Democracy after liberalism: Pragmatism and deliberative politics. New York: Routledge, 2005.
TRONTO, J. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge, 2020.
WALLACE, J. Norms and practices. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.
WARREN, J. Occupational fraud 2023: A report to the nations. (13th ed.). Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2024. Available at: https://legacy.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2024/
WILL, F. The rational governance of practice. In: WESTPHAL, K. (Org.). Pragmatism and realism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997. p. 63-84.
WILLIAMS, B. Moral luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. 1 in 3 people globally do not have access to safe drinking water, 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/18-06-2019-1-in-3-people-globally-do-not-have-access-to-safe-drinking-water-unicef-who
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. The top 10 causes of death, 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Billions left behind on the path to universal health coverage, September 18, 2023. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/18-09-2023-billions-left-behind-on-the-path-to-universal-health-coverage
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. The state of food security and nutrition in the world, July 12, 2023a. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/the-state-of-food-security-and-nutrition-in-the-world-2023
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
