Somewhere in between grammar and lexis

the role of verb types in learner production of caused-motion constructions

Authors

Rodrigo Garcia Rosa Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1538-1542

Keywords:

Caused-motions Constructions, Modification and Instantiation verbs, Proficiency, Learner language, Corpora

Abstract

This article deals with the selection, extraction and analysis of learner written production of English caused-motion constructions. The data extraction targeted four groups of learners with regard to their L1s (Brazilian Portuguese, Spanish, Italian and French) and their levels of English proficiency (from A1 to C2 in the CEFR). The data were extracted from EFCamDAT corpus, a morpho-syntactically tagged corpus of learner written production. The analysis targets the lexical variability in the production of learners across levels of proficiency and with different L1s so as to verify the extent to which we can claim learners have access to schematic caused motions or whether they appeal to specific verb classes, namely, instantiation and modification verbs. The results, especially the quantitative ones, indicate a strong reliance on verbal over constructional knowledge in the production of English caused-motion structures. The study also sheds light on developmental factors involving the relationship between grammar and lexis.

Author Biography

Rodrigo Garcia Rosa, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Doutor em estudos linguísticos e literários da língua inglesa pela Universidade de São Paulo. Professor dos cursos de graduação e pós-graduação da Faculdade Cultura Inglesa.

References

BAICCHI, A. Construction learning as a complex adaptive system: psycholinguistic evidence from L2 learners of English. Berlin: Springer, 2015.

BYBEE, J. L. From usage to grammar: the mind's response to repetition. Language, v. 82, p. 711-733, 2006.

BYBEE, J. L. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In: TROUSDALE, T.; HOFFMANN, G. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 49-69.

CABRERA, M.; ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. Constructional properties versus lexical specific transfer: overgeneralized causatives in L2 English and L2 Spanish. BUCLD 28 Proceedings Supplement, 2004.

ELLIS, N. C. Second language acquisition. In: TROUSDALE, T.; HOFFMANN, G. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 365-378.

ELLIS, N.; FERREIRA-JUNIOR, F. Constructions and their acquisition: islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, v. 7, p. 187-220, 2009.

EVANS, V.; GREEN, M. Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.

FILLMORE, C. J. “Corpus linguistics” vs. “computer-aided armchair linguistics”. In: Directions in corpus linguistics: proceedings from a 1991 Nobel Symposium on Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992. p. 35-66.

GOLDBERG, A. E. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.

GOLDBERG, A. E. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

GOLDBERG, A. E. Constructionist approaches. In: TROUSDALE, T.; HOFFMANN, G. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 15-32.

GOLDBERG, A. E.; CASENHISER, D.; SETHURAMAN, N. A lexically based proposal of argument structure meaning. Chicago Linguistic Society, 2003.

GRANGER, S. The computer learner corpus: a versatile new source of data for SLA research. In: GRANGER, S. (Ed.). Learner English on computer. Edinburgh: Addison Wesley Longman, 1998. p. 3-18.

GRANGER, S. Learner corpora. In: LÜDELING, A.; KYTÖ, M. (Eds.). Corpus linguistics: an international handbook. v. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. p. 259-275.

GRIES, S. Th.; WULFF, S. Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, n. 3, p. 182-200, 2005.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. Quantitative studies and probabilities in grammar. In: HOEY, M. (Ed.). Data, description, discourse: papers on the English language in honour of John Sinclair. London: HarperCollins, 1993. p. 1-25.

LANGACKER, R. W. Essentials of cognitive grammar. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

LINDQUIST, H. Corpus linguistics and the description of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.

MCENERY, T.; HARDIE, A. Corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

SCHMID, H. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: from corpus to cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.

SCHMID, H. Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In: GLYNN, D.; FISHER, K. (Eds.). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010. p. 101-135.

SINCLAIR, J. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

SVARTVIK, J. Directions in corpus linguistics: proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4-8 August 1991. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992. (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 65).

TEUBERT, W. Corpus linguistics: an alternative. Semen, n. 27, p. 130-152, 2009.

ZUBIZARRETA, M. L.; OH, E. On the syntactic composition of manner and motion. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26

Issue

Vol. 46 No. 1 (2025): Fluxo Contínuo

Section

Papers

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The authors grant the journal all copyrights relating to the published works. The concepts issued in signed articles are the absolute and exclusive responsibility of their authors.