Self-assessment: Practice or Representation?

Authors

  • Sueli S. Fidalgo

Keywords:

self-assessment, formative-qualitative assessment, representation, validity.

Abstract

Based on a socio-discursive interactional perspective (Bronckart, 1997), this paper presents data analysis of a research which by using a selfassessment instrument, aimed, firstly, at investigating the representations (Silva, 1999) presented by a teacher about assessment matters, and, secondly, at showing that assessment instruments are context-bound. Knowing that, in practice, these instruments are many times designed by one person for a large number of students, I analyzed students’ and teachers’ validation (Habermas, 1985) of tasks proposed by another teacher, and looked at their representation of aspects that compose the learning-teaching of English. Initial results show that no matter how carefully the instrument is designed (by others), it may pose difficulties for some learners, inasmuch as the assessment moment is part and parcel of the teaching-learning process for both teachers and learners, and not a separate aspect to be used in a staccato style. If schools seek instruments which will allow children to reflect upon their own learning, thus becoming more capable of regulating this learning (Perrenoud, 1998), careful look into the design of such instruments will be needed.

Author Biography

Sueli S. Fidalgo

Sueli Salles Fidalgo is an English teacher and holds a Master’s Degree in Applied Linguistics – which is also the area of her current doctoral studies at the Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP). For the last six years, she has been working with Teacher Education, first as coordinator of a Language Institute in São Paulo and, later, in preservice programs – undergraduate courses in language and literature – and in-service programs – at the extramural courses offered by COGEAE, PUC-SP, as well as in Centro Universitário Ibero-Americano (Unibero) and Universidade de Taubaté (Unitau). Her main interests include the dichotomy between inclusion and exclusion, and learning assessment matters.

Issue

Section

Papers