O rural nas inovações democráticas: uma proposta comparativa América Latina-Europa
Palavras-chave:
inovações democráticas, rural, participação cidadã, América Latina, EuropaResumo
Este artigo compara inovações democráticas (IDs) em áreas rurais da Europa e da América Latina, destacando diferenças em abordagens e motivações. Na Europa, as IDs se concentram no desenvolvimento rural, nas políticas ambientais e nas melhorias económicas locais, com foco no fortalecimento institucional e na sustentabilidade, sem desafiar o modelo político existente. Em contraste, na América Latina, o rural é um espaço de lutas emancipatórias, como a defesa de direitos indígenas e a soberania alimentar, sendo um campo de batalha por autonomia e justiça social. O artigo argumenta que, enquanto na Europa as IDs aprimoram políticas públicas, na América Latina elas desafiam noções estabelecidas de desenvolvimento e direitos, variando significativamente entre contextos sociopolíticos.
DOI:
Referências
ALTIERI, M. A. (1992). Sustainable agricultural development in Latin America: exploring the possibilities. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. Amsterdam, v. 39, n. 1-2, pp. 1-21.
______ (2009). Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review, v. 61, n. 3, pp. 102-113.
BÄCHTIGER, A.; DRYZEK, J. S.; MANSBRIDGE, J.; WARREN, M. E. (2018). The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BARHAM, E. (2003). Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies. Nova York, v. 19, pp. 127-138.
BILLEN, G.; AGUILERA, E.; EINARSSON, R.; GARNIER, J.; GINGRICH, S.; GRIZZETTI, B.; SANZ-COBENA, A. (2024). Beyond the farm to fork strategy: methodology for designing a European agro-ecological future. Science of the Total Environment. Nova York, v. 908, p. 168160.
BJØRKHAUG, H.; BÜKE, A.; RIBEIRO, J. D.; SIPPEL, S. R. (2023). The food system in the (post-)pandemic world: disruptions, vulnerability, resilience, and alternatives - 1. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food. Paris, v. 29, n. 2, pp. 35-37.
BORRAS, S. M. (2008). La Vía Campesina and its global campaign for agrarian reform. Journal of Agrarian Change, v. 8, n. 2-3, pp. 258-289.
______ (2023). La Via Campesina – transforming agrarian and knowledge politics, and co-constructing a field: a laudatio. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Londres, v. 50, n. 2, pp. 691-724.
BUA, A.; BUSSU, S. (2021). Between governance-driven democratisation and democracy-driven governance: Explaining changes in participatory governance in the case of Barcelona. European Journal of Political Research. Londres, v. 60, n. 3, pp. 716-737.
BUREAU, J.-C.; MAHÉ, L.-P. (2008). CAP Reform Beyond 2013: an idea for a longer view. Notre Europe. Retrieved from https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/capreformbeyond2013-bureaumahe-ne-dec08-1.pdf.
CABANNES, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization. Londres, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 27-46.
______ (2015). The impact of participatory budgeting on basic services: municipal practices and evidence from the field. Environment and Urbanization, v. 27, n. 1, pp. 257-284.
CARTER, M. (org.) (2015). Challenging social inequality: the landless rural workers movement and agrarian reform in Brazil. Durham, Duke University Press.
CARTY, R. K.; BLAIS, A.; FOURNIER, P. (2008). “When citizens choose to reform smp: the British Columbia citizens' assembly on electoral reform”. In: BLAIS, A. To keep or to change first past the post? Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DAVIS, D. E. (1999). The power of distance: Re-theorizing social movements in Latin America. Theory and Society, v. 28, pp. 585-638.
DELLA PORTA, D.; FELICETTI, A. (2022). Innovating democracy against democratic stress in Europe: Social movements and democratic experiments. Representation. Londres, v. 58, n. 1, pp. 67-84.
DEERE, C. D.; ROYCE, F. S. (org.) (2009). Rural social movements in Latin America: organizing for sustainable livelihoods. Gainesville, University Press of Florida.
DRYZEK, J. S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
______ (2024). For example: How to use examples in political science. American Political Science Review, pp. 1-13.
DRYZEK, J. S. et al. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science. Nova York, v. 363, n. 6432, pp. 1144-1146.
EDELMAN, M. et al. (2014). Introduction: critical perspectives on food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Londres, v. 41, n. 6, pp. 911-931.
ELSTUB, S.; ESCOBAR, O. (org.) (2019). Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
ESCOBAR, A. (2008). Territories of diff erence: place, movements, life, redes. Durham, Duke University Press.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2022). A long-term vision for the EU’s rural areas: building the future of rural areas together. Disponível em: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/new-pusheuropean-democracy/long-term-vision-rural-areas_en. Acesso em: 2 set 2024.
ECVC – European Coordination Via Campesina (2021). Farm to fork strategy: key messages from ECVC. Retrieved from https://www.eurovia.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-02-01-FINALE-ENECVC-documento-F2F-FR.pdf.
FALANGA, R. et al. (2024). Database and timeline on the history of participation and engagement (1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10830077.
FERNANDES, B. M. (2013). Re-peasantization, resistance and subordination: the struggle for land and agrarian reform in Brazil. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy. Nova Delhi, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 269-289.
______ (2020). Peasant movements in Latin America. Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
FIELD, L. W. (1991). Tools for indigenous agricultural development in Latin America: an anthropologist's perspective. Agriculture and Human Values. Dordrecht, v. 8, n. 1-2, pp. 85-92.
FIGUEIREDO, E. (coord.) (2011). O rural plural. Olhar o presente, imaginar o futuro. Castro Verde – Alentejo, 100Luz.
FONTE, M.; PAPADOPOULOS, A. G. (org.) (2010). Naming food after places: food relocalisation and knowledge dynamics in rural development. Farnham, Ashgate Publishing Limited.
FUNG, A.; WRIGHT, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Londres, Verso.
GANUZA, E.; BAIOCCHI, G. (2012). The power of ambiguity: how participatory budgeting travels the globe. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, v. 8, n. 2. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.142.
GEISSEL, B.; JOAS, M. (2013). Participatory democratic innovations in Europe: improving the quality of democracy? Opladen, Verlag Barbara Budrich.
GHERGHINA, S.; MOKRE, M.; MIȘCOIU, S. (2021). Deliberative democracy, under-represented groups and inclusiveness in Europe. Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research. Londres, v. 34, n. 5, pp. 633-637.
HALFACREE, K. (1993). Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 9, n. 1, pp. 23-37.
HARRIS, C. (2019). “Deliberative mini-publics: Defining and designing”. In: ELSTUB, S.; ESCOBAR, O. (org.). Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
HEYL, K.; DÖRING, T.; GARSKE, B.; STUBENRAUCH, J.; EKARDT, F. (2020). The common agricultural policy beyond 2020: a critical review in light of global environmental goals. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. Oxford, v. 30, n. 1, pp. 95-106.
HIRSCH, C. (2017). Between resistance and negotiation: indigenous organizations and the Bolivian state in the case of TIPNIS. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Londres, v. 46, n. 4, pp. 811-830.
JACQUET, V. (2017). Explaining non-participation in deliberative mini-publics. European Journal of Political Research. Londres, v. 56, n. 3, pp. 640-659.
JACQUET, V.; RYAN, M.; VAN DER DOES, R. (org.) (2023). The impacts of democratic innovations. Colchester, ECPR Press.
KAY, C. (2001). Refl ections on rural violence in Latin America. Third World Quarterly. Londres, v. 22, n. 5, pp. 741-775.
LAWRENCE, M.; HOMER-DIXON, T.; JANZWOOD, S.; ROCKSTÖM, J.; RENN, O.; DONGES, J. F. (2024). Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability. Londres, v. 7, p. e6.
LEFF, E. (1986). Ecología, capital y cultura: perspectivas latinoamericanas. México, Siglo XXI Editores.
LEITE, S. P.; ÁVILA, R. V. D. (2007). Reforma agrária e desenvolvimento na América Latina: rompendo com o reducionismo das abordagens economicistas. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural. Brasília, v. 45, n. 3, pp. 777-805.
LOSEKANN, C. (2016). A política dos afetados pelo extrativismo na América Latina. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política. Brasília, n. 20, pp. 121-164.
MARTINS, J. S. (2010). O cativeiro da terra. São Paulo, Contexto.
MCGIFFEN, S. P. (2005). The European Union: a critical guide. Londres, Pluto Press.
MENEGAT, R. (2002). Participatory democracy and sustainable development: integrated urban environmental management in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Environment and Urbanization. Londres, v. 14, n. 2, pp. 181-206.
MERINO, R. (2020). The geopolitics of food security and food sovereignty in Latin America: harmonizing competing visions or reinforcing extractive agriculture? Geopolitics. Londres, v. 27, n. 3.
MORGAN, K.; MARSDEN, T.; MURDOCH, J. (2006). Worlds of food: place, power and provenance in the food chain. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
MORTON, J. (2007). The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 104, n. 50, pp. 19680-19685.
MURDOCH, J.; MARSDEN, T. (1996). Reconstituting rurality: Class, community and power in the countryside. Londres, UCL Press.
NELSON, A. (2020). Covid-19: capitalist and postcapitalist perspectives. Human Geography. Londres, v. 13, n. 3, pp. 305-309.
OECD (2006). The new rural paradigm: policies and governance. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. Paris, OECD Publishing.
______ (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: catching the deliberative wave. Paris, OECD Publishing.
OPITZ, C. (2024). Democratic innovations administered: The organisational embeddedness of public administrators’ a? tudes towards participatory policy making. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, v. 20, n. 1.
PARRY, L. J.; CURATO, N.; DRYZEK, J. S. (2024). Governance of deliberative mini-publics: emerging consensus and divergent views. Policy & Politics (published online ahead of print 2024). Retrieved Feb 8, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736Y2024D000000043.
PILET, J.; BOL, D.; VITTORI, D.; PAULIS, E. (2022). Public support for deliberative citizens' assemblies selected through sortition: evidence from 15 countries. European Journal of Political Research, v. 62, n. 3, pp. 873-902.
POGREBINSCHI, T. (2017). Latinno Dataset. Berlin, WZB.
______ (2023). Innovating democracy? The means and ends of citizen participation in Latin America. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
ROJAS-MARCHINI, F. (2023). The legal geographies of indigenous consultation and conservation law in Chile. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Londres, pp. 1-29.
ROSSET, P.; ALTIERI, M. A. (2017). Agroecology: science and politics. Rugby, Practical Action Publishing.
SCOONES, I.; EDELMAN, M.; BORRAS, S. M.; HALL, R.; WOLFORD, W.; WHITE, B. (2017). Emancipatory rural politics: confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Londres, v. 45, n. 1, pp. 1-20.
SCOONES, I.; BORRAS Jr., S. M.; BAVISKAR, A.; EDELMAN, M., PELUSO, N. L.; WOLFORD, W. (ed.) (2024). Climate change and critical agrarian studies. Londres/Nova York, Routledge.
SHUCKSMITH, M.; THOMPSON, K. J.; ROBERTS, D. (ed.) (2005). The CAP and the regions – the Territorial impact of the common agricultural policy. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.
SHUCKSMITH, M.; CAMERON, S.; MERRIDEW, T.; PICHLER, F. (2009). Urban-rural diff erences in quality of life across the European Union. Regional Studies, v. 43, n. 10, pp. 1275-1289.
SILVA, D. S. D.; FIGUEIREDO, E.; EUSÉBIO, C.; CARNEIRO, M. J. (2016). The countryside is worth a thousand words – Portuguese representations on rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies. Londres, v. 44, pp. 77-88.
SOBREIRO, T. S. (2015). Can urban migration contribute to rural resistance? Indigenous mobilization in the middle Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Londres, v. 42, n. 6.
SOYER, G.; BARBOSA JR., R. (2020). O extrativismo agrário do governo Bolsonaro a partir das relações estado-sociedade. Revista da ANPEGE, v. 16, n. 29, pp. 522-554.
SMITH, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
______ (2021). Can democracy safeguard the future? Cambridge, Polity.
SOUZA, C. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: Limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environment and Urbanization. Londres, v. 13, n. 1, pp. 159-184.
STEVANO, S.; FRANZ, T.; DAFERMOS, Y.; WAEYENBERGE, E. V. (2021). Covid-19 and crises of capitalism: intensifying inequalities and global responses. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d'Études Du Développement. Ottawa, v. 42, n. 1-2, pp. 1-17.
TIRADO BALLESTEROS, J. G.; HERNÁNDEZ HERNÁNDEZ, M. (2016). Assessing the impact of EU rural development programs on tourism. Tourism Planning & Development, v. 14, n. 2, pp. 149-166.
VAN DER PLOEG, J. D.; LONG, A. (org.) (1994). Born from within. Practice and perspective of endogenous rural development. Assen, Van Gorcum.
VELTMEYER, H. (2022). Extractivism and beyond. The Extractive Industries and Society. Amsterdam, v. 11, p. 101132.
VRYDAGH, J.; DEVILLERS, S.; TALUKDER, D.; JACQUET, V.; BOTTIN, J (2021). Les mini-publics en Belgique (2001-2018): expériences de panels citoyens délibératifs. Courrier Hebdomadaire Du CRISP. Bruxelas, v. 32, n. 2477-2478, pp. 5-72.
WALSH, C.; ELKINK, J. A. (2021). The dissatisfied and the engaged: citizen support for citizens’ assemblies and their willingness to participate. Irish Political Studies. Dublin, v. 36, n. 4, pp. 647-666.
WAMPLER, B. (2010). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: contestation, cooperation, and accountability. Pensilvânia, Penn State University Press.
WARREN, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, v. 3, n. 1, pp. 3-13.
______ (2017). A problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review. Washington/D.C., v. 111, n. 1, pp. 39-53.
WILLIAMS, R. (1973). The country and the city. Londres, Chatto & Windus.
WINTER, M. (2003). Embeddedness, the new local food economy and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies. Londres, v. 19, pp. 23-32.
WOLFORD, W. W.; WHITE, B.; SCOONES, I.; HALL, R.; EDELMAN, M.; BORRAS, S. M. (2024). Global land deals: what has been done, what has changed, and what’s next? The Journal of Peasant Studies, pp.1-38.
WOODS, M. (2011). Rural. Londres, Routledge.
WRIGHT, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. Londres, Verso Books.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 José Duarte Ribeiro, João Moniz
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A revista não tem condições de pagar direitos autorais nem de distribuir separatas.
O Instrumento Particular de Autorização e Cessão de Direitos Autorais, datado e assinado pelo(s) autor(es), deve ser transferido no passo 4 da submissão (Transferência de Documentos Suplementares). Em caso de dúvida consulte o Manual de Submissão pelo Autor.
O conteúdo do texto é de responsabilidade do(s) autor(es).
